![listaway review listaway review](https://www.review-australia.com/on/demandware.static/-/Library-Sites-review-shared-library/default/dwe3b207ca/blog/Blog%20-%20Packing%20List%20for%20a%20Weekend%20Away/Packing%20List%20for%20a%20Weekend%20Away/220_R10_Blog_PackingListforaWeekendAway_ListingImage.jpg)
![listaway review listaway review](https://musicisimmortal.weebly.com/uploads/8/8/5/4/8854548/6685967_orig.jpg)
“Human well-being” is receiving much attention by academics, policy-makers, and practitioners throughout the world however, little is understood within the well-being literature about the well-being benefits derived from the natural environment and its ecosystem services.
![listaway review listaway review](https://apprecs.org/ios/images/screenshots-ipad/600/47/872589383-3.jpg)
We will examine the contributing elements of well-being namely, basic human needs, economic needs, and subjective well-being and then examine the potential linkages between human well-being and its components to ecosystem services. Until recently, little has been written specifically connecting ecosystem services and well-being. In this manuscript, we examine the contribution of ecosystem services to the maintenance and improvement of human well-being based on literature from the last 20 years. Despite a growing recognition of the importance of ecosystem services, their value is often overlooked in environmental decision making. In making decisions about human activities, such as draining a wetland for a housing development, it is essential to consider both the value of the development and the value of the ecosystem services that could be lost. Nutrient recycling, habitat for plants and animals, neutralization of pollutants, protection from natural disasters, control of pest outbreaks and diseases, and water supply are among the many beneficial services provided by aquatic ecosystems. While a cursory evaluation of these changes to ecosystems have appeared to enhance the well-being of billions of people, they have also caused a substantial and largely irreversible loss in diversity of life on Earth, have strained the capacity of ecosystems to continue providing critical services, altered our perception of place and our comfort level with nature and, in the long-term, significantly will reduce human well-being. We have done this to meet the growing demands for food, freshwater, timber, fiber, and fuel. Humans have changed ecosystems more rapidly and extensively in the last 50 years than in any comparable period of human history (Daily 1997). Yet growing human pressures on the environment profoundly disrupt the functioning of natural systems and significantly reduce the delivery of these services. The processes of cleansing, recycling, and renewal, along with goods such as seafood, forage, and timber, are worth many trillions of dollars annually, and nothing could live without them. Life itself, as well as the entire human economy, depends on goods and services provided by earth’s natural systems (Daily 1997). So, what we do not want is to have to worry or deal with losses in nutrient regulation, toxic contamination, poor soil productivity, climatic disasters, or illness (physical or mental). While we (in this case we is a nation) do not pay for them, we pay significantly for their loss in terms of wastewater treatments facilities, moratoriums on greenhouse gases, increased illnesses, reduced soil fertility, and losses in those images of nature that contribute to our basic happiness. These services may not cost the world’s population in dollars but everyday decisions almost always have some effect on the magnitude and quality of ecosystem services provided.
#Listaway review for free
However, many people believe that nature provides these services for free and therefore, they are of little or no value. Natural ecosystems perform fundamental life-support services upon which human civilization depends.